Home

The Riddle that is Delimitation

By Amba Charan Vashishth

At the elevation of controversy over delimitation of constituencies in Himachal Pradesh, the Chair of the Delimitation Perpetration in 2002 declared: He will go by the suitableness of the public and not by that of the politicians. But indeed, with the Government of India now deciding to the take the report of Delimitation Perpetration for Himachal along with other States where preference process has already been completed, the Choice Commission and the Delimitation Perpetration have in fact achieved exactly the turn topsy-turvy and ignored the "suitableness of the public".

In 2002, the Delimitation Perpetration was trying to run against duration to complete the continued movement in time for the HP collection elections then due in February 2003. But for some discursive power or the other, this could not be done and the elections were held as per the old delimitation. But it was then contemplation that the process of delimitation would be completed well before next elections due in February 2008 (though held in December 2007) to gripe elections as per the new recommendations.

It is integrity mentioning that although the annunciate of the Delimitation Perpetration was notified by the HP Conduct as back as January 2007, yet in the elections held after 11 months in December 2007, the Communicate was totally ignored.

The elections to Gujarat congregation in December 2007 too were held according to the old delimitation. So about the States of Tripura, Nagaland, Meghalaya going to the polls in Move forward this year. In Karnataka elections due in May 2008 the announce of the Delimitation Perpetration is again likely to be ignored.

In all fairness, the elections to every Plight assembly should be held as per the recommendations of the Delimitation Perpetration to cater to the "suitableness of the public" in place of creating not theoretical problems for them later on.

The elections held as per the old system have created a very...

Read more...